EU lawmakers are reportedly considering a delay in the enforcement of certain provisions of the EU Artificial Intelligence Act (AI Act). While the AI Act formally entered into force on 1 August 2024, its obligations apply on a rolling basis. Requirements related to AI literacy and the prohibition of specific AI practices have been applicable since 2 February 2025. Additional obligations are scheduled to come into effect on 2 August 2025 (general-purpose AI (GPAI) model obligations), 2 August 2026 (transparency obligations and obligations on Annex III high-risk AI systems), and 2 August 2027 (obligations on Annex I high-risk AI systems). The timeline and certainty of regulatory enforcement of these future obligations now appears uncertain.Continue Reading European Commission hints at delaying the AI Act

Quantum computing uses quantum mechanics principles to solve certain complex mathematical problems faster than classical computers.  Whilst classical computers use binary “bits” to perform calculations, quantum computers use quantum bits (“qubits”).  The value of a bit can only be zero or one, whereas a qubit can exist as zero, one, or a combination of both states (a phenomenon known as superposition) allowing quantum computers to solve certain problems exponentially faster than classical computers.

The potential applications of quantum computing are wide-ranging and industry-agnostic. For instance, they could be used to enhance the analysis of large, complex data sets, optimize supply-chain processes, and enhance artificial intelligence (“AI”) technologies and improve machine learning algorithms.

Given the potential applications, quantum computing could have a significant impact on companies in the life sciences sector, and more specifically could be used to improve:Continue Reading Quantum Computing and its Impact on the Life Science Industry

On 28 June 2025, the European Accessibility Act (“EAA”)—a 2019 directive—will begin applying to covered products and services.  The EAA imposes various obligations on technology and online service providers among others, requiring them to ensure that the products and services that they offer in the EU are made accessible to consumers with disabilities. According to its recitals, the goal of the EAA is to increase the availability of accessible products and services in the EU and improve the accessibility of information provided to consumers about those products and services.Continue Reading European Accessibility Act: June 2025 deadline has arrived

On Friday, May 23, the Federal Communications Commission (the “FCC”) released a Public Notice requesting public input on whether certain CAV-related communications equipment and services with connections to Russia and the People’s Republic of China should be added to the “Covered List” – a list maintained by the FCC of communications equipment and services found…

Continue Reading FCC Seeks Public Input on Adding Connected Vehicle Technology to the Covered List

In a new post on the Inside Privacy blog, our colleagues discuss key consumer protection considerations for companies deploying AI chatbots in the EU market.

Continue Reading Digital Fairness Act Series: Topic 2 – Transparency and Disclosure Obligations for AI Chatbots in Consumer Interactions

In a new post on the Inside Privacy blog, our colleagues discuss Federal Trade Commission cases that highlight the agency’s willingness to pursue enforcement against companies that make deceptive claims involving AI.

Continue Reading FTC Challenges Deceptive Artificial Intelligence Claims

In February 2025, the European Commission published two sets of guidelines to clarify key aspects of the EU Artificial Intelligence Act (“AI Act”): Guidelines on the definition of an AI system and Guidelines on prohibited AI practices. These guidelines are intended to provide guidance on the set of AI Act obligations that started to apply on February 2, 2025 – which includes the definitions section of the AI Act, obligations relating to AI literacy, and prohibitions on certain AI practices.

This article summarizes the key takeaways from the Commission’s guidelines on the definition of AI systems (the “Guidelines”). Please see our blogs on the guidelines on prohibited AI practices here, and our blog on AI literacy requirements under the AI Act here.Continue Reading European Commission Guidelines on the Definition of an “AI System”

In February 2025, the European Commission published two sets of guidelines to clarify key aspects of the EU Artificial Intelligence Act (“AI Act”): Guidelines on the definition of an AI system and Guidelines on prohibited AI practices. These guidelines are intended to provide guidance on the set of AI Act obligations that started to apply on February 2, 2025 – which includes the definitions section of the AI Act, obligations relating to AI literacy, and prohibitions on certain AI practices.

This article summarizes the key takeaways from the Commission’s guidelines on prohibited AI practices (“Guidelines”). Please see our blogs on the guidelines on the definition of AI systems here, and our blog on AI literacy requirements under the AI Act here.Continue Reading European Commission Guidelines on Prohibited AI Practices under the EU Artificial Intelligence Act

On April 3, 2025, the Budapest District Court made a request for a preliminary ruling to the Court of Justice of the European Union (“CJEU”) relating to the application of EU copyright rules to outputs generated by large language model (LLM)-based chatbots, specifically Google’s Gemini (formerly Bard), in response to a user prompt. This Case C-250/25 involves a dispute between Like Company, a Hungarian news publisher, and Google Ireland Ltd.Continue Reading CJEU Receives Questions on Copyright Rules Applying to AI Chatbot

On June 2, 2025, the Global Cross-Border Privacy Rules (“CBPR”) Forum officially launched the Global CBPR and Privacy Recognition for Processors (“PRP”) certifications.  Building on the existing Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation (“APEC”) CBPR framework, the Global CBPR and PRP systems aim to extend privacy certifications beyond the APEC region.  They will allow controllers and processors to voluntarily undergo certification for their privacy and data governance measures under a framework that is recognized by many data protection authorities around the world.  The Global CBPR and PRP certifications are also expected to be recognized in multiple jurisdictions as a legitimizing mechanism for cross-border data transfers.Continue Reading Global CBPR and PRP Certifications Launched: A New International Data Transfer Mechanism