Photo of Andrew Garrahan

Andrew Garrahan

Andrew Garrahan represents and counsels clients at the intersection of law and politics. He guides them through both regulatory compliance issues and government investigations on matters including state and federal campaign finance, ethics, lobbying, and corruption, as well as in congressional investigations.

Andrew’s prior career in political fundraising gives him a unique perspective on the challenges faced by his clients, which include corporations, candidates, government officials, political and nonprofit organizations, and private individuals.

Andrew’s counseling and advisory practice includes:

guiding clients on structuring of and compliance for their state and federal lobbying and grassroots advocacy campaigns;
representing campaigns, Super PACs, corporations, trade associations, and individuals on the applicability of the Federal Election Campaign Act (FECA) and state campaign finance law;
counseling on Foreign Agents Registration Act (FARA) registration and disclosure, and its interaction with the Lobbying Disclosure Act (LDA);
helping companies comply with state and federal ethics laws, particularly on gifts and conflicts of interests, and domestic anticorruption; and
auditing corporate political law compliance practices.

Andrew’s investigations and defense work includes:

representing clients in Congressional investigations, including responding to letter requests and subpoenas;
preparing company officers and other individuals for testimony in Congressional investigative hearings;
defending clients in Department of Justice matters related to campaign finance, lobbying, ethics, and public corruption; and
representing clients before the FEC and state campaign finance, lobbying, and ethics regulators.

Contact:Read more about Andrew GarrahanEmail

Late this afternoon, the U.S. Supreme Court granted a stay of the Fourth Circuit’s decision setting aside the FCC Media Bureau’s guidance on entitlement to the lowest unit charge (“LUC”) for certain political ads placed on broadcast TV and radio.  See our prior post about this issue here.  Notably, the 60-day political window for the November midterms begins today, so broadcasters’ obligation to afford qualifying buys the LUC is now in effect.

As a result of today’s decision, the FCC Media Bureau’s guidance is back in effect.  That guidance found that two types of broadcast political ads were entitled to the LUC: ads paid for as “party coordinated expenditures” (meaning ads paid for by a party in coordination with a federal candidate), and ads placed by joint fundraising committees involving a federal candidate.

Continue Reading Supreme Court Action Revives FCC Media Bureau’s Political Ad Guidance

On August 25, 2026, a divided panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit set aside guidance by the FCC’s Media Bureau stating that two types of political advertising were entitled to the favorable “lowest unit charge” (“LUC”) rate: ads paid for as “party coordinated expenditures,” meaning ads paid for by a party in coordination with a federal candidate, and ads placed by joint fundraising committees involving a federal candidate. This question had become particularly salient after the Supreme Court’s decision in June that struck down limits on party coordinated expenditures, allowing unlimited party spending in coordination with candidates, as we explained here. The Fourth Circuit’s ruling was in response to a challenge to the Media Bureau’s Public Notice by four Democratic candidates for federal office. The ongoing litigation has a direct and immediate impact on broadcasters and political advertisers, but its broader significance may lie in what the Fourth Circuit said about judicial review of bureau-level FCC actions.

Continue Reading Fourth Circuit Sets Aside FCC Media Bureau Guidance on Lowest Unit Charge; FCC Asks the Supreme Court to Step In