In the final days of 2022, President Biden signed into law the “Quantum Computing Cybersecurity Preparedness Act”.  The Act recognizes that current encryption protocols used by the federal government might one day be vulnerable to compromise as a result of quantum computing, which could allow adversaries of the United States to steal sensitive encrypted data.  To address these concerns, the Act will require an inventory and prioritization of vulnerable information technology in use by federal agencies; a plan to migrate existing information technology systems; and reports to Congress on the progress of the migration and funding required. 

Inventory and Prioritization.  Within six months, the Act requires the Director of the Office of Management and Budget (“OMB”), together with the National Cyber Director and Director of the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (“CISA”), to issue guidance for agencies to inventory and develop a plan to prioritize information systems for migration to post-quantum cryptography:

  • Inventory of Vulnerable Systems Guidance:  The Act will require that the guidance that a requirement for agencies to establish and maintain a current inventory of information technology in use by the agency that is vulnerable to decryption by quantum computers. 
  • Priority Systems for Migration Guidance:  This guidance must also include a description of information technology that should be prioritized for migration to post-quantum cryptography and a process for evaluating progress on the migration of those systems.  The Act defines post-quantum cryptography as “those cryptographic algorithms or methods that are assessed not to be specifically vulnerable to attack by either a quantum computer or classical computer.” 

Migration of Agency Information Technology Systems.  Not later than one year after the Director of the National Institute of Standards and Technology (“NIST”) has issued guidance on post-quantum cryptography standards, the Director of the OMB must issue additional guidance requiring each agency to (1) prioritize information technology systems for migration and (2) develop a plan for migration.  The Director of OMB is required by the Act to ensure that prioritization is assessed and coordinated for interoperability.

Reports to Congress.  No later than 15 months after enactment of this Act, the Director of OMB must submit a report to Congress on a strategy to address risk posed by vulnerabilities of information technology systems; an estimate of the amount of funding needed by agencies to secure vulnerable information technology; and a description of efforts to develop standards for post-quantum cryptography by NIST.  

We will continue to monitor these and other quantum computing related developments.

Print:
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn
Photo of Jayne Ponder Jayne Ponder

Jayne Ponder provides strategic advice to national and multinational companies across industries on existing and emerging data privacy, cybersecurity, and artificial intelligence laws and regulations.

Jayne’s practice focuses on helping clients launch and improve products and services that involve laws governing data privacy…

Jayne Ponder provides strategic advice to national and multinational companies across industries on existing and emerging data privacy, cybersecurity, and artificial intelligence laws and regulations.

Jayne’s practice focuses on helping clients launch and improve products and services that involve laws governing data privacy, artificial intelligence, sensitive data and biometrics, marketing and online advertising, connected devices, and social media. For example, Jayne regularly advises clients on the California Consumer Privacy Act, Colorado AI Act, and the developing patchwork of U.S. state data privacy and artificial intelligence laws. She advises clients on drafting consumer notices, designing consent flows and consumer choices, drafting and negotiating commercial terms, building consumer rights processes, and undertaking data protection impact assessments. In addition, she routinely partners with clients on the development of risk-based privacy and artificial intelligence governance programs that reflect the dynamic regulatory environment and incorporate practical mitigation measures.

Jayne routinely represents clients in enforcement actions brought by the Federal Trade Commission and state attorneys general, particularly in areas related to data privacy, artificial intelligence, advertising, and cybersecurity. Additionally, she helps clients to advance advocacy in rulemaking processes led by federal and state regulators on data privacy, cybersecurity, and artificial intelligence topics.

As part of her practice, Jayne also advises companies on cybersecurity incident preparedness and response, including by drafting, revising, and testing incident response plans, conducting cybersecurity gap assessments, engaging vendors, and analyzing obligations under breach notification laws following an incident.

Jayne maintains an active pro bono practice, including assisting small and nonprofit entities with data privacy topics and elder estate planning.