Technology companies will be in for a bumpy ride in the second Trump Administration. President-elect Trump has promised to adopt policies that will accelerate the United States’ technological decoupling from China. However, he will likely take a more hands-off approach to regulating artificial intelligence and reverse several Biden Administration policies related to AI and other emerging technologies.Continue Reading Tech Policy in a Second Trump Administration: AI Promotion and Further Decoupling from China
Trump Signals Continued Focus on “Big Tech” in Naming Brendan Carr as FCC Chair
On Sunday evening, President-elect Donald Trump announced that he will name Federal Communications Commission (FCC) Commissioner Brendan Carr as Chair of the FCC. Because Commissioner Carr is a sitting Commissioner, no Senate confirmation is needed, and he will become FCC Chairman as of Inauguration Day on January 20, 2025.
While Carr was widely seen as…
Continue Reading Trump Signals Continued Focus on “Big Tech” in Naming Brendan Carr as FCC ChairU.S. Tech Legislative, Regulatory & Litigation Update – Third Quarter 2024
This quarterly update highlights key legislative, regulatory, and litigation developments in the third quarter of 2024 related to artificial intelligence (“AI”) and connected and automated vehicles (“CAVs”). As noted below, some of these developments provide industry with the opportunity for participation and comment.
I. Artificial Intelligence
Federal Legislative Developments
There continued to be strong bipartisan…
Continue Reading U.S. Tech Legislative, Regulatory & Litigation Update – Third Quarter 2024NIST Report and Recommendations on Fostering Development of the Internet of Things
On October 22, the National Institute of Standards and Technology (“NIST”) Internet of Things (“IoT”) Advisory Board released the Internet of Things Advisory Board Report, which concludes that IoT development has progressed more slowly than anticipated and identifies 26 findings that explain the slower pace of development and growth. The Report offers 104 recommendations on how the government can help foster IoT development. The Advisory Board provided this report to the IoT Federal Working Group emphasizing that an IoT transformation will boost U.S. economic growth, increase public safety and national resilience, create a more sustainable planet, individualize healthcare, foster equitable quality of life and well-being, and facilitate autonomous operations of our national infrastructure. For background, the IoT Federal Working Group was established by Congress in 2020 and was charged with identifying policies and statutes inhibiting IoT development and consider recommendations of the Advisory Board. Continue Reading NIST Report and Recommendations on Fostering Development of the Internet of Things
Pennsylvania Court Finds Promotion Program During Presidential Campaign Not a Lottery
On November 12, 2024, the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County (the “court”) released is decision holding that the promotional effort to award $1 million to persons who indicated their support for the U.S. Constitution did not constitute a lottery under Pennsylvania law. This decision marks a rare instance in which a court has ruled upon whether the key elements of a “lottery” or similar gambling scheme were present in a consumer-facing promotional effort. In this case the court held that the key elements of a lottery (prize, chance, and consideration) were not present.
Background
On October 19, 2024, the founder of America PAC (Mr. Elon Musk) stated at a Pennsylvania rally that he would award $1 million per day for the next two weeks to a registered voter who signed America PAC’s petition pledging support for the U.S. Constitution and the First and Second Amendments. America PAC also announced this promotional program on the website X with a post that stated the PAC “will be randomly awarding one million dollars every day from now until election day, to registered Pennsylvania voters who sign America PAC’s petition, and a surprise member of the audience as the first winner.” This post also included a video that stated the money would be awarded “randomly” to people who signed the petition and agreed to be a spokesperson for the petition. Subsequent posts promoting the program mentioned signing the petition for a chance to win $1 million.Continue Reading Pennsylvania Court Finds Promotion Program During Presidential Campaign Not a Lottery
Texas Legislature to Consider Sweeping AI Legislation in 2025
On October 28, Texas State Representative Giovanni Capriglione (R-Tarrant County) released a draft of the Texas Responsible AI Governance Act (“TRAIGA”), after nearly a year collecting input from industry stakeholders. Representative Capriglione, who authored Texas’s Data Privacy and Security Act (discussed here) and currently co-chairs the state’s AI Advisory Council, appears likely to introduce TRAIGA in the upcoming legislative session scheduled to begin on January 14, 2025. Modeled after the Colorado AI Act (SB 205) (discussed here) and the EU AI Act, TRAIGA would establish obligations for developers, deployers, and distributors of “high-risk AI systems.” Additionally, TRAIGA would establish an “AI Regulatory Sandbox Program” for participating AI developers to test AI systems under a statutory exemption.
Although a number of states have expressed significant interest in AI regulation, if passed, Texas would become the second state to enact industry-agnostic, risk-based AI legislation, following the passage of the Colorado AI Act in May. There is significant activity in other states as well, as the California Privacy Protection Agency considers rules that would apply to certain automated decision and AI systems, and other states are expected to introduce AI legislation in the new session. In addition to its requirements for high-risk AI and its AI sandbox program, TRAIGA would amend Texas’s Data Privacy and Security Act to incorporate AI-specific provisions and would provide for an AI workforce grant program and a new “AI Council” to provide advisory opinions and guidance on AI.Continue Reading Texas Legislature to Consider Sweeping AI Legislation in 2025
Likely Trends in U.S. Tech and Media Regulation Under the New Trump Administration
With U.S. President Trump returning to the White House, we expect the regulatory landscape facing technology and communications companies to shift significantly, if not uniformly.
On the one hand, media and telecommunications companies that have long been regulated heavily by the FCC can likely expect a more deregulatory environment than they have experienced under the Biden Administration (with potential caveats). On the other, large technology companies, which have largely avoided heavy-handed regulation, can expect to face a more active regulatory environment aimed at limiting or preventing content moderation decisions that the incoming Administration has characterized as “censorship” of conservative viewpoints. Meanwhile, bipartisan priorities—such as the commitment to ensuring national security in the telecommunications sector—will likely continue to be a major focus of regulatory agencies. While the assessments of regulatory risks and opportunities will continue to be refined and updated as the next Trump administration takes shape, we highlight here a few trends that are likely to influence policy and regulation at the FCC over the next four years.Continue Reading Likely Trends in U.S. Tech and Media Regulation Under the New Trump Administration
California PUC Adopts New Rules Implementing Sweeping Changes in Regulation of Interconnected VoIP Providers
Last week, California’s telecommunications regulator, the California Public Utilities Commission (“CPUC”), adopted a new regulatory framework for providers of interconnected voice over Internet protocol (“iVoIP”) that marks a significant shift in regulation of a service that has long been lightly regulated both at the state and federal level. Under the new rules adopted at Thursday’s CPUC meeting, iVoIP providers are now subject to registration and licensing requirements in California, which also will require that these companies notify the CPUC of – and in some cases, seek prior approval for – any transfers of control or assignments of their assets.
The new rules could have significant and far-reaching ramifications for carriers providing iVoIP services in the largest market in the United States. For example, because the CPUC’s decision now requires at least some form of filing with the regulator before transfer of control of an iVoIP provider may occur, financial or strategic investors focused on the telecommunications space should take note that regulatory requirements may apply to any acquisition or investment in an iVoIP provider with operations in California. In some circumstances, a transfer of control of a California iVoIP provider or assignment of iVoIP provider assets may require prior approval from the CPUC, a process that tends to be the lengthiest state regulatory approval process for communications transactions that require state review.
Substantively, the CPUC’s order concerns the creation of new utility classifications (and corresponding authorization types) for iVoIP providers, which are subject to different licensing or registration requirements depending on the nature of the iVoIP services they provide. The following is a summary of the three new utility types and the key requirements for each from the CPUC’s order.
European Commission Adopts Implementing Regulation on DSA Transparency Reporting Obligations
On November 4, 2024, the European Commission (“Commission”) adopted the implementing regulation on transparency reporting under the Digital Services Act (“DSA”). The implementing regulation is intended to harmonise the format and reporting time periods of the transparency reports required by the DSA.
Transparency reporting is required under Articles 15, 24 and…
Continue Reading European Commission Adopts Implementing Regulation on DSA Transparency Reporting ObligationsBrazilian Government Opens Consultation on Artificial Intelligence and Data Protection
Brazil’s National Data Protection Agency (“ANPD”) initiated a public consultation on the relationship between artificial intelligence (AI) and data protection. At this point, there is no proposed draft regulation, but ANPD is requesting responses to 15 open-ended questions. The consultation may lead to specific legislation and regulation.
The questions include topics such as: the compatibilization of AI and data protection principles; AI-related data treatment; data ownership rights in connection with AI use; and good practices and governance.
The consultation is open until December 5, 2024.Continue Reading Brazilian Government Opens Consultation on Artificial Intelligence and Data Protection