State legislatures have passed new laws focused on disclosing the use of AI in advertisements or depictions of individuals. On September 16, California Governor Gavin Newsom signed SB 1050, a new law requiring disclosures when certain advertisements prominently feature a “synthetic performer.” This was one of several AI-related measures signed by Governor Newsom this year, which we summarized in our prior blog post.
Continue Reading New AI Transparency Requirements Enacted For Advertisers And DeployersArtificial Intelligence (AI)
California Governor Signs Over 20 AI-related Bills into Law
By Jayne Ponder, Diana Lee & Evan Chiacchiaro on
Posted in Artificial Intelligence (AI), Technology
Governor Gavin Newsom of California signed over 20 AI-related bills into law in the final days of September. Several of these bills address topics such as frontier model and generative AI oversight, AI transparency, and new requirements for use of AI in particular industries, described below. In addition to these bills, Governor Newsom also signed into law a sweeping set of AI bills relating to minors’ safety and privacy, which are described in our prior blog post, and novel frameworks related to the use of ADMT in the workplace, which we previously summarized here.
These newly passed laws include the following:
Continue Reading California Governor Signs Over 20 AI-related Bills into LawNew California AI Employment Laws: Key Requirements for Employers
On September 30, California Governor Gavin Newsom signed three laws that will regulate the use of AI in the employment context, starting in the new year. Below, we briefly summarize these developments, which we discuss in greater detail in our prior blog post. These laws join an existing body of California AI employment regulations.…
Continue Reading New California AI Employment Laws: Key Requirements for EmployersCalifornia Legislature Advances AI Employment Bills
By Lindsey Tonsager, Carolyn Rashby & Bryan Ramirez on
At the end of August, the California legislature passed three bills that would regulate the use of AI in the employment context. These bills are now on Governor Newsom’s desk, and he has until September 30 to sign or veto. Below is a summary of the three bills.
SB 947 (The “No Robo Bosses Act”)…
Continue Reading California Legislature Advances AI Employment BillsADMT Law Round-Up: What Employers Need to Know About Recent ADMT Laws
Employers increasingly rely on automated tools to help make decisions concerning hiring, promotion, discipline, and termination. In response, state legislatures and agencies have begun to regulate uses of these technologies, often referred to as automated decision-making technology (“ADMT”). These laws generally require entities that deploy ADMT in the employment context to, among other requirements, notify…
Continue Reading ADMT Law Round-Up: What Employers Need to Know About Recent ADMT LawsFrench CNIL Publishes Note on Agentic AI and Data Protection
By Jadzia Pierce on
On July 20, 2026, the French data protection authority (the Commission Nationale de l’Informatique et des Libertés, “CNIL”) published a joint exploratory note with the French AI and Digital Council (“CIANum”) on the data protection implications of agentic AI (the “Note”). The Note is exploratory rather than prescriptive: it does not purport to state definitive regulatory expectations, and it does not announce forthcoming guidance. However, it does provide helpful considerations for when the EU’s General Data Protection Regulation (“GDPR”) might come under strain in the course of processing personal data via autonomous systems, and identifies legal and technical measures that might help mitigate potential risks. The CNIL frames this exercise as connected to its engagement with several international counterparts, including through the G7 data protection authorities during the French G7 presidency.
The Note is the latest in a rapidly accumulating body of regulator commentary on agentic AI, including by the UK ICO, Spanish AEPD, and Singaporean IMDA. Below are some key takeaways.
Continue Reading French CNIL Publishes Note on Agentic AI and Data ProtectionWhite House Launches “Gold Eagle” AI Cybersecurity Clearinghouse
On July 14, 2026, the Trump Administration announced the launch of a federal clearinghouse, “Gold Eagle,” that is designed to facilitate the sharing of AI-derived cybersecurity vulnerability information between government agencies, “American critical infrastructure companies,” and “open-source software partners.”
The creation of Gold Eagle is the latest in a series of Administration actions focused…
Continue Reading White House Launches “Gold Eagle” AI Cybersecurity ClearinghouseU.S. Tech Legislative & Regulatory Update – Second Quarter 2026
This update highlights key legislative and regulatory developments in the second quarter of 2026 related to artificial intelligence (“AI”), connected and automated vehicles (“CAVs”), and Internet of Things (“IoT”).
Continue Reading U.S. Tech Legislative & Regulatory Update – Second Quarter 2026Illinois Enacts Frontier Model Safety Law
Posted in Artificial Intelligence (AI), Frontier Models
On July 6, 2026, Illinois Governor JB Pritzker signed into law SB 315, a frontier model safety act that resembles the New York RAISE Act, discussed in our prior blog post here, and California’s Transparency in Frontier Artificial Intelligence Act (TFAIA), discussed in our prior blog post here. The law takes effect January 1, 2027, with transparency-reporting and audit obligations beginning January 1, 2028. Similar to the New York and California laws, SB 315 will apply to frontier developers (i.e., persons that train, or initiate the training of, a frontier model using computing power greater than 10^26 integer or floating point operations), with certain provisions applicable only to large frontier developers (i.e., frontier developers with annual gross revenue over $500 million in the preceding year). SB 315 also includes public safety disclosure and reporting requirements. Notably, SB 315 also imposes a third-party audit requirement not found in either the New York or the California law.
Continue Reading Illinois Enacts Frontier Model Safety LawBacklash to Bipartisan AI Omnibus Illustrates Preemption Impasse
By Matthew Shapanka, Evan Chiacchiaro & Samuel Klein on
On June 4, Representatives Jay Obernolte (R-CA) and Lori Trahan (D-MA) released a sweeping discussion draft of their Great American Artificial Intelligence Act. The latest bipartisan AI legislation quickly met bipartisan skepticism, particularly concerning the draft’s approach to federal preemption of state AI rules, with many House Democrats opposing the broad preemption for frontier model developers, while many House Republicans and other stakeholders lamented the bill’s omission of preemption for state laws reaching other parts of the AI ecosystem.
The bill would also establish mandatory disclosure and risk-mitigation requirements for frontier models and task the Center for Artificial Intelligence Standards and Innovation (CAISI) at the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) with oversight of federal AI-related research and analysis, standards and guidelines development, and risk-mitigation activities.
Continue Reading Backlash to Bipartisan AI Omnibus Illustrates Preemption Impasse