On 31 August 2023, the UK’s House of Commons Innovation and Technology Committee (“Committee”) published an interim report (“Report”) evaluating the UK Government’s AI governance proposals and examining different approaches to the regulation of AI systems. As readers of this blog will be aware, in March 2023, the UK Government published a White Paper setting out its “pro-innovation approach to AI regulation” which will require existing regulators to take responsibility for promoting and overseeing responsible AI within their sectors (for further information on the UK Government’s strategy, see our blog post here).

The Report recommends that the UK Government introduce a “tightly-focused AI Bill” in the next parliamentary session to “position the UK as an AI governance leader”.

The following is a summary of key aspects of the Report:

Challenges in AI Governance

Based on evidence provided by public and private sector stakeholders, the Committee has identified 12 challenges of AI governance that they believe the UK Government should address through domestic policy and international engagement. According to the Report, the challenges include:

  • Bias:  AI systems may introduce or perpetuate biases;
  • Privacy:  AI systems could allow individuals’ personal information to be gathered and used;
  • Intellectual property and copyright:  AI models could use third party’s content in ways that infringe IP in that content;
  • Liability:  If third parties use AI systems to do harm, policy must establish whether developers or providers of those systems bear any liability; and
  • International coordination:  AI is a global technology, and the development of governance frameworks to regulate its uses should be an international undertaking.

The UK Government’s Approach to AI Regulation

The Committee acknowledged that the Government’s AI White Paper “should be welcomed as an initial effort to engage with a complex task”. However, the Committee also made a number of recommendations to Government, including:

  • carrying out a gap analysis of the UK’s regulators, which considers resourcing capacity and whether regulators require new powers to implement and enforce the principles outlined in the AI White Paper; and
  • confirming whether AI-specific legislation will be introduced and what work has been undertaken across Government to explore the possible content of that legislation.

Next Steps

The UK Government is expected to respond to the Report and has also committed to providing a wider update on its regulatory approach to AI through a response to the White Paper consultation later this year. We expect there to be further UK AI policy developments following the AI Safety Summit  the Government is convening in November 2023. According to the UK Government, the Summit will bring together AI companies, international governments, academics and civil society groups to discuss potential risks of AI and how they can be mitigated through internationally coordinated action.

***

Covington regularly advises the world’s top technology companies on their most challenging regulatory, compliance, and public policy issues in the EU, UK and other major markets. We are monitoring the EU and UK’s developments very closely and will be updating this site regularly – please watch this space for further updates.

Print:
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn
Photo of Marianna Drake Marianna Drake

Marianna Drake counsels leading multinational companies on some of their most complex regulatory, policy and compliance-related issues, including data privacy and AI regulation. She focuses her practice on compliance with UK, EU and global privacy frameworks, and new policy proposals and regulations relating…

Marianna Drake counsels leading multinational companies on some of their most complex regulatory, policy and compliance-related issues, including data privacy and AI regulation. She focuses her practice on compliance with UK, EU and global privacy frameworks, and new policy proposals and regulations relating to AI and data. She also advises clients on matters relating to children’s privacy, online safety and consumer protection and product safety laws.

Her practice includes defending organizations in cross-border, contentious investigations and regulatory enforcement in the UK and EU Member States. Marianna also routinely partners with clients on the design of new products and services, drafting and negotiating privacy terms, developing privacy notices and consent forms, and helping clients design governance programs for the development and deployment of AI technologies.

Marianna’s pro bono work includes providing data protection advice to UK-based human rights charities, and supporting a non-profit organization in conducting legal research for strategic litigation.

Photo of Lisa Peets Lisa Peets

Lisa Peets is co-chair of the firm’s Technology and Communications Regulation Practice Group and a member of the firm’s global Management Committee. Lisa divides her time between London and Brussels, and her practice embraces regulatory compliance and investigations alongside legislative advocacy. In this…

Lisa Peets is co-chair of the firm’s Technology and Communications Regulation Practice Group and a member of the firm’s global Management Committee. Lisa divides her time between London and Brussels, and her practice embraces regulatory compliance and investigations alongside legislative advocacy. In this context, she has worked closely with many of the world’s best-known technology companies.

Lisa counsels clients on a range of EU and UK legal frameworks affecting technology providers, including data protection, content moderation, platform regulation, copyright, e-commerce and consumer protection, and the rapidly expanding universe of additional rules applicable to technology, data and online services. Lisa also routinely advises clients in and outside of the technology sector on trade related matters, including EU trade controls rules.

According to Chambers UK (2024 edition), “Lisa provides an excellent service and familiarity with client needs.”

Will Capstick

Will Capstick is a Trainee who attended BPP Law School.

Photo of Marty Hansen Marty Hansen

Martin Hansen has over two decades of experience representing some of the world’s leading innovative companies in the internet, IT, e-commerce, and life sciences sectors on a broad range of regulatory, intellectual property, and competition issues. Martin has extensive experience in advising clients…

Martin Hansen has over two decades of experience representing some of the world’s leading innovative companies in the internet, IT, e-commerce, and life sciences sectors on a broad range of regulatory, intellectual property, and competition issues. Martin has extensive experience in advising clients on matters arising under EU and U.S. law, UK law, the World Trade Organization agreements, and other trade agreements.