Technology companies will be in for a bumpy ride in the second Trump Administration.  President-elect Trump has promised to adopt policies that will accelerate the United States’ technological decoupling from China.  However, he will likely take a more hands-off approach to regulating artificial intelligence and reverse several Biden Administration policies related to AI and other emerging technologies.

On the campaign trail, President-elect Trump made clear he intends to employ industrial policy tools, including tariffs, outbound investment restrictions, export controls, and other economic and national security levers that will further decouple technological supply chains, restrict cross-border innovation, and limit commercial activity with Chinese entities or with entities in China, including U.S. entities.

The President-elect’s strict decoupling approach to China will likely represent an escalation of the Biden Administration’s two-part strategy to out-innovate China in the United States and restrict the flow of critical technologies to “countries of concern.”  Under President Biden, the Commerce Department recently concluded a comment period on a proposed rule regulating connected vehicle technologies, continuing work that began in President Trump’s first term.  Similarly, the Justice Department recently published a proposed rule regarding access to sensitive personal and government data in “countries of concern.”  And the Treasury Department recently finalized its long-anticipated rule restricting outbound investment. 

In Congress, the House Select Committee on Strategic Competition Between the United States and the Chinese Communist Party served as a successful bipartisan clearinghouse for recommending policies aligned with this two-part strategy in the 118th Congress.  Although the Select Committee lacked legislative jurisdiction, House Speaker Mike Johnson has announced that it will continue to hold hearings and conduct broad investigations into U.S. business activity in China in the next Congress.

When President-elect Trump assumes office, we expect him to continue this two-prong strategy, although he will place greater emphasis on restricting foreign technologies than on promoting U.S. innovation.

For example, his proposed tariffs on imports from China would impose increased costs on Chinese products while also increasing prices for American consumers (and for American businesses that rely on input goods from China).  Moreover, House of Representatives Republicans have shown significant appetite for two successive Congresses to enact comprehensive outbound investment, sanctions, and export-controls legislation.  House leaders are debating whether to append provisions related to Uyghur forced labor, supply-chain restrictions, outbound investment notice requirements, and other controls to the FY25 National Defense Authorization Act, which is likely the last significant legislative vehicle of the 118th Congress.  The outbound investment legislation would be a notable inclusion, given that the Treasury Department’s final rule is scheduled to take effect on January 2.

On the domestic front, Trump may seek to roll back aspects of the CHIPS and Science Act, a bipartisan hallmark achievement of the Biden Administration.  In a preelection gaffe, Speaker Johnson said that Republican lawmakers would “probably” try to repeal the CHIPS Act, though he quickly walked his comments back.  Ultimately, while the Commerce Department under Trump will likely reverse Biden Administration policies requiring CHIPS Act funding applicants to make childcare and workforce development commitments, Republicans appear largely aligned on the strategic priority of bolstering advanced manufacturing capacity in the United States.  Rather than repeal the CHIPS Act, a Trump Administration may seek to repurpose unspent CHIPS Act funds (which would require congressional approval) to other priorities or refocus funding exclusively on U.S.-based companies instead of bolstering companies based in allied countries.

Even with the change in party control of the White House and Senate, artificial intelligence regulation is likely to remain a significant policy priority at the federal and state levels.  The Republican governing trifecta is likely to continue promoting AI development and deployment with a possibly greater risk tolerance for the nascent technology.

President-elect Trump pledged to immediately revoke the Biden Administration’s Executive Order on the Safe, Secure, and Trustworthy Development and Use of Artificial Intelligence and implement an AI policy “rooted in free speech and human flourishing.”  This suggests a comparably laissez-faire approach to regulating AI, and we expect the incoming Congress and administration to most emphasize private AI innovation as opposed to government use and management of AI.

Both the House and Senate have invested ample time and resources in the 118th Congress to hold hearings and introduce legislation related to AI.  Still, significant AI bills have not advanced on the floor of either chamber.  Bills that have advanced through committee tend to relate to the government’s own evaluation, procurement, and use of AI, or to providing resources to support AI research and development.  Congress will likely continue to pursue these priorities while also taking cues from the new administration.

Meanwhile, states will work in parallel to regulate AI and privacy, as we view preemptive federal legislation to be unlikely.  Even though high-profile AI safety bills, like California SB 1047, were not enacted, lawmakers in California, Colorado, Texas, and other states will continue to pursue comprehensive legislation to impose standards and guardrails on the most sophisticated and high-risk systems.

Finally, Congress and the Trump Administration will likely renew efforts to strengthen the cryptocurrency industry.  Both the Trump campaign and congressional Republicans have expressed strong support for allowing digital currencies to grow, opposing Securities and Exchange Commission Chair Gary Gensler’s efforts to regulate the industry.  Shortly after Election Day, House Majority Leader Steve Scalise included the creation of a “regulatory framework that allows digital assets to grow with certainty” on a list of House Republican priorities for the first 100 days of the next Congress.

Print:
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn
Photo of Holly Fechner Holly Fechner

Holly Fechner advises clients on complex public policy matters that combine legal and political opportunities and risks. She leads teams that represent companies, entities, and organizations in significant policy and regulatory matters before Congress and the Executive Branch.

She is a co-chair of…

Holly Fechner advises clients on complex public policy matters that combine legal and political opportunities and risks. She leads teams that represent companies, entities, and organizations in significant policy and regulatory matters before Congress and the Executive Branch.

She is a co-chair of the Covington’s Technology Industry Group and a member of the Covington Political Action Committee board of directors.

Holly works with clients to:

Develop compelling public policy strategies
Research law and draft legislation and policy
Draft testimony, comments, fact sheets, letters and other documents
Advocate before Congress and the Executive Branch
Form and manage coalitions
Develop communications strategies

She is the Executive Director of Invent Together and a visiting lecturer at the Harvard Kennedy School of Government. She serves on the board of directors of the American Constitution Society.

Holly served as Policy Director for Senator Edward M. Kennedy (D-MA) and Chief Labor and Pensions Counsel for the Senate Health, Education, Labor & Pensions Committee.

She received The American Lawyer, “Dealmaker of the Year” award in 2019. The Hill named her a “Top Lobbyist” from 2013 to the present, and she has been ranked by Chambers USA – America’s Leading Business Lawyers from 2012 to the present. One client noted to Chambers: “Holly is an exceptional attorney who excels in government relations and policy discussions. She has an incisive analytical skill set which gives her the capability of understanding extremely complex legal and institutional matters.” According to another client surveyed by Chambers, “Holly is incredibly intelligent, effective and responsive. She also leads the team in a way that brings out everyone’s best work.”

Photo of Matthew Shapanka Matthew Shapanka

Matthew Shapanka is a strategic policy and regulatory attorney who helps technology companies and other businesses navigate complex, high-stakes legislative, regulatory, and enforcement matters at the intersection of law and politics. Drawing on 15+ years of experience across private practice, the U.S. Senate…

Matthew Shapanka is a strategic policy and regulatory attorney who helps technology companies and other businesses navigate complex, high-stakes legislative, regulatory, and enforcement matters at the intersection of law and politics. Drawing on 15+ years of experience across private practice, the U.S. Senate, state government, and political campaigns, Matt develops comprehensive policy strategies that identify regulatory risks and position clients to shape policy outcomes.

Public Policy and Regulatory Strategy

Matt serves as a strategic advisor to Fortune 200 companies on emerging technology policy, including artificial intelligence regulation, connected and autonomous vehicles, semiconductors, IoT, and national security matters. He translates complex legal and technical issues into actionable legislative and regulatory strategy, building the policy frameworks and advocacy infrastructure that enable clients to influence policy. He develops policy collateral for federal, state, and international advocacy, coordinates multi-stakeholder coalitions, and represents clients before Congress, federal agencies, and state legislative and regulatory bodies.

His technology policy experience includes securing unprecedented Presidential intervention in the $118 billion Qualcomm-Broadcom transaction (for which Covington was recognized as The American Lawyer 2019 “Dealmakers of the Year”), advising Fortune 200 companies on Bureau of Industry and Security connected vehicle rules, and counseling major internet platforms on autonomous vehicle policy across dozens of states.

Matt leads Covington’s state public policy practice, managing complex multistate legislative and regulatory advocacy campaigns. His state-level work includes securing a last-minute amendment to California’s 2023 money transmitter legislation on behalf of a fintech client and representing major technology companies on state AI, autonomous vehicle, and political advertising compliance matters across dozens of jurisdictions.

Matt rejoined Covington after serving as Chief Counsel for the U.S. Senate Committee on Rules and Administration under Chairwoman Amy Klobuchar (D-MN), where he negotiated the landmark bipartisan Electoral Count Reform Act – legislation that updated presidential election certification procedures for the first time in nearly 140 years. He also oversaw the Committee’s bipartisan January 6th investigation, developing protocols that resulted in unanimous passage of new Capitol security legislation.

Both in Congress and at Covington, Matt has prepared dozens of corporate executives, nonprofit leaders, academics, and presidential nominees for testimony at congressional committee hearings and depositions. He is a skilled legislative drafter and strategist who has composed dozens of bills and amendments introduced in Congress and state legislatures, including many that have been enacted into law.

Election and Political Law Compliance and Enforcement

As a member of Covington’s Chambers-ranked (Band 1) Election and Political Law practice, Matt advises businesses, nonprofits, political committees, candidates, and donors on the full range of federal and state political law compliance matters, including:

Election and campaign finance laws
Lobbying disclosure
Government ethics rules
The SEC Pay-to-Play Rule

He also conducts political law due diligence for M&A transactions, counsels major political funders and donors in compliance and enforcement matters, and represents candidates, ballot measure committees, and donors in election disputes and recounts.

Before law school, Matt served in the administration of former Governor Deval Patrick (D-MA), where he worked on policy, communications, and compliance matters for federal economic recovery funding awarded to the state. He has also staffed federal, state, and local political candidates in Massachusetts and New Hampshire.

Photo of Samuel Klein Samuel Klein

Samuel Klein counsels clients on mitigating reputational risks, responding to government investigations, and navigating the regulatory and political environment for strategic public engagement. As a member of Covington’s Election and Political Law Practice Group, Sam helps clients facing Congressional investigations and advises on…

Samuel Klein counsels clients on mitigating reputational risks, responding to government investigations, and navigating the regulatory and political environment for strategic public engagement. As a member of Covington’s Election and Political Law Practice Group, Sam helps clients facing Congressional investigations and advises on election administration, ethics, and campaign finance laws. Working with the firm’s Public Policy Practice Group, he advises on federal and state initiatives for clients in technology, finance, and other regulated industries. He maintains an active pro bono practice. Before joining Covington, Sam served as a law clerk at the Federal Election Commission, interned for two committee leaders in Congress, and worked as a public affairs consultant.