Driverless and autonomous vehicles (“AVs”) are moving from test tracks and pilot schemes to commercial deployment around the world. In the U.S. and China, robotaxi fleets and autonomous trucking services are proliferating. Similar developments are happening in the EU and UK. In London, the first commercial autonomous ride-hailing service launched in early September 2026, with a supervised fleet carrying paying passengers. In Germany, regulators have granted the first nationwide authorisations for Level 4 urban testing and cab-less Level 4 autonomous trucks. At the international level, UNECE has adopted the first global rules for fully driverless vehicles, as discussed in our earlier blog post here.

As AV technology matures, the regulatory and liability frameworks that will govern it are starting to emerge. This article provides an overview of the key developments that will affect autonomous vehicle manufacturers, and technology companies and mobility-service providers operating in this sector.

Current State of AV Deployment

In the EU, 18 Member States signed a Joint Declaration of Intent in June 2026 on large-scale cross-border testbeds for autonomous vehicles, under the European Automotive Action Plan. In Germany, the Federal Motor Transport Authority (KBA) granted nationwide authorisation in July 2026 for Level 4 automated-driving testing on urban roads — the first such nationwide urban approval, allowing testing across German cities without a separate authorisation process required in each location.

In the UK, the Automated Vehicles (Permits for Automated Passenger Services) Regulations 2026 came into force on 15 May 2026, creating a clear framework and dedicated portal for companies to obtain permits to offer automated passenger services. The portal is now open. As of late September 2026, no operator has yet completed the relevant vehicle-registration stage or applied for a driverless permit – we continue to monitor this space. Separately, the UK Department for Transport’s consultation on a draft Statement of Safety Principles for automated vehicles, which will set the safety-related benchmarks for automated vehicles, closed on 9 September 2026.

London’s first commercial autonomous ride-hailing service launched in early September 2026. This currently operates with a trained, Transport for London (TfL)-licensed driver on board to monitor trips and intervene if necessary. These services run under the ordinary private-hire licensing framework rather than the new driverless permit scheme.  

Implementing the UNECE Framework for Automated Driving Systems

In June 2026, UNECE’s World Forum for Harmonization of Vehicle Regulations (“WP.29”) adopted the first international regulatory framework for fully driverless Automated Driving Systems (“ADS”), comprising a new UN Regulation (“UNR”), and a companion Global Technical Regulation (“GTR”). For more information, see our earlier blog post here.

Following adoption of the UNR on ADS, the European Commission is preparing a delegated regulation to amend the annexes to the General Safety Regulation (EU) 2019/2144, which is likely to incorporate the new UN ADS Regulation. Commission adoption is currently planned for the fourth quarter of 2026.

The UK’s plans for adopting the UNR on ADS is less clear at this stage. The UK Department for Transport’s August 2026 consultation on GB type approval (which closed on 29 September) does not propose incorporating the UN ADS Regulation into the domestic framework.

Liability Framework

As AVs move from test tracks to public roads, the question of who bears liability when something goes wrong remains top of mind for legislators, regulators and industry stakeholders. The EU’s recent reform of its product liability framework will directly affect companies supplying autonomous-driving software and AI, and similar changes may be to come in the UK.

The EU is already ahead of the UK in this area, having adopted a major reform of its product liability framework through the revised Product Liability Directive (“PLD”). Although already adopted, the revised PLD applies only to products placed on the market or put into service from 9 December 2026. The revised PLD modernises EU product liability law by expressly bringing software within scope, whether supplied on a standalone basis or integrated into a product. This is particularly significant for autonomous vehicles, where liability exposure may extend beyond the physical vehicle to autonomous-driving software and AI-enabled driving functions. In addition, certain related digital services may themselves fall within scope, including, for example, services providing the continuous supply of traffic or navigation data. The PLD must be transposed into national law by 9 December 2026. Transposition is underway and divergences are already emerging (creating uncertainty and scope for satellite litigation).  The Commission has also been engaging with Member States on implementation issues as the date of application approaches. (For more information on the PLD, see our client alert here, and our blog post here on PLD transposition.)

Meanwhile, a cross-party group of senior MEPs has reportedly recently urged the EU Commission to consider new specific AI liability legislation to address perceived gaps in the framework for harms caused by advanced AI systems, following the formal withdrawal in 2025 of the proposed AI Liability Directive.

In the UK, the Jurisdiction Taskforce (“UKJT”) recently analyzed the current provision for allocation of responsibility for AI-related harms, concluding that existing English law principles (e.g., contract, negligence and, to a lesser extent, statutory strict liability) are generally capable of allocating responsibility without a new bespoke regime. The statement includes an AV-specific illustration, suggesting that existing principles of contributory negligence could be applied to reduce liability where an AI system recommended a driving route across soft tidal sands and a user crossed the beach knowing the hazard.  The statement is non-binding but likely to be of persuasive value (the UKJT’s membership includes respected academics and members of the judiciary).

However, the UK Law Commission is actively reviewing the current product liability regime with a view to making recommendations for reform, and has AI clearly in its sights. It considers the current regime to be no longer fit for purpose, and is considering options to modernise the law, including to account for emerging technologies, including AI. The review is considering whether to introduce similar claimant-friendly reforms to those in the new PLD. Its proposals for reform are expected to be published for consultation before the end of 2026.

Next Steps

The remainder of 2026 appears likely to be a defining period for AV regulation in the EU and UK. In the EU, the Commission’s delegated regulation incorporating the UNECE driverless framework into the General Safety Regulation is expected in Q4, while the deadline for Member State transposition of the revised Product Liability Directive is 9 December.

In the UK, the Department for Transport has promised a further consultation in the second half of 2026 on the Automated Vehicles Act secondary legislation, covering authorisation, operator licensing, safety principles and data access. The Law Commission’s product liability reform proposals are expected before year-end.  On the deployment side, permits for the first automated passenger-services and paid journeys are yet to be granted, but may not be that far off.  

Taken together, these developments indicate that AV regulation in the EU and UK is entering a more operational phase. Businesses across the AV supply chain should be engaging now to closely monitor the rules still being written and to prepare for the compliance obligations that are already or will shortly be in effect.

Print:
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn
Photo of Sam Jungyun Choi Sam Jungyun Choi

Recognized by Law.com International as a Rising Star (2023), Sam Jungyun Choi is an associate in the technology regulatory group in Brussels. She advises leading multinationals on European and UK data protection law and new regulations and policy relating to innovative technologies, such…

Recognized by Law.com International as a Rising Star (2023), Sam Jungyun Choi is an associate in the technology regulatory group in Brussels. She advises leading multinationals on European and UK data protection law and new regulations and policy relating to innovative technologies, such as AI, digital health, and autonomous vehicles.

Sam is an expert on the EU General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) and the UK Data Protection Act, having advised on these laws since they started to apply. In recent years, her work has evolved to include advising companies on new data and digital laws in the EU, including the AI Act, Data Act and the Digital Services Act.

Sam’s practice includes advising on regulatory, compliance and policy issues that affect leading companies in the technology, life sciences and gaming companies on laws relating to privacy and data protection, digital services and AI. She advises clients on designing of new products and services, preparing privacy documentation, and developing data and AI governance programs. She also advises clients on matters relating to children’s privacy and policy initiatives relating to online safety.

Photo of Alan Kenny Alan Kenny

Focusing on high value, multi-party and multi-jurisdictional matters, Alan Kenny advises companies, banks, institutions, and high-net-worth individuals on all stages of dispute avoidance and resolution.

Alan has notable experience of high profile and complex commercial litigation, competition litigation, and class actions. He acts…

Focusing on high value, multi-party and multi-jurisdictional matters, Alan Kenny advises companies, banks, institutions, and high-net-worth individuals on all stages of dispute avoidance and resolution.

Alan has notable experience of high profile and complex commercial litigation, competition litigation, and class actions. He acts for clients in a broad range of industries with particular experience in financial services, technology, fast moving consumer goods, commodities, and media.

Alan has represented clients in:

Pre-action negotiations;
Mediation;
Commercial litigation before the English High Court and Court of Appeal (and internationally with local counsel);
Competition litigation, including class action proceedings before the UK’s Competition Appeal Tribunal;
International arbitration and trade association arbitration under a variety of rules, including LCIA, HKIAC, SCAI, LMAA, GAFTA and FOSFA;
Responding to enquiries from – and defending enforcement proceedings brought by – regulators in the UK and internationally;
Bringing competition-related complaints to the European Commission, leading to investigations and dawn raids;
Proceedings to obtain emergency and interim relief, including: security, vessel and container arrest, freezing orders, disclosure orders, Norwich Pharmacal and Bankers Trust orders, delivery up of passport orders, search orders, committal orders, and anti-suit injunctions;
Settlement negotiations;
Proceedings to enforce judgments; and
Proceedings to compel UK-based third parties to produce evidence under the Hague Convention for use in foreign proceedings.

Alan is a contributing editor of the International Comparative Legal Guide to Litigation and Dispute Resolution.

Alan’s recent pro bono work includes:

Advising an international development charity working to combat poverty and climate change, to settle disputes with distributors relating to its projects to provide access to solar power in Malawi and Zambia.
Representing a charity that provides young people with opportunities to explore orchestral music, obtaining a judgment and third party debt orders to successfully recover payments made to a catering company for services that were not provided.
Representing a vulnerable, single-parent immigrant family facing deportation to obtain rights of residence and access to public funds and pursue UK citizenship.
Representing a charity that works with vulnerable women and children to remove defamatory statements relating to the charity and its staff from third party websites, search engine result pages, and other media.

Photo of Harriet Hanks Harriet Hanks

Harriet Hanks is an experienced litigator with a broad commercial disputes practice. She has particular expertise in the life sciences, consumer products and technology sectors.
Harriet’s experience covers commercial disputes, coordination of multi-jurisdictional litigation including product liability group claims, class actions, regulatory enforcement…

Harriet Hanks is an experienced litigator with a broad commercial disputes practice. She has particular expertise in the life sciences, consumer products and technology sectors.
Harriet’s experience covers commercial disputes, coordination of multi-jurisdictional litigation including product liability group claims, class actions, regulatory enforcement matters, as well as licensing and post-M&A disputes. Harriet’s work is often cross-border and involves multiple parties.

Harriet also brings to her practice significant in-house (secondment) experience within U.S.-headquartered multinational organizations. She was seconded to a global consumer technology company’s litigation team, and earlier in her career to a medical devices multinational working on product liability and regulatory mandates.

Harriet is recognized by Chambers (Product Liability, Mainly Defendant), and described by clients as “extremely talented,” “absolutely up to speed on issues and outstanding in the way that she handles matters,” and “very personable, client-focused and [having] excellent attention to detail.”

Photo of Anna Sophia Oberschelp de Meneses Anna Sophia Oberschelp de Meneses

Anna Sophia Oberschelp de Meneses advises on EU data protection, cybersecurity, and consumer law. Her practice covers the full range of Europe’s digital regulatory framework, including GDPR, ePrivacy, NIS2, the Cyber Resilience Act, the AI Act, the Digital Services Act, the Data Act…

Anna Sophia Oberschelp de Meneses advises on EU data protection, cybersecurity, and consumer law. Her practice covers the full range of Europe’s digital regulatory framework, including GDPR, ePrivacy, NIS2, the Cyber Resilience Act, the AI Act, the Digital Services Act, the Data Act, the European Health Data Space, and EU consumer protection law, including product safety, product liability, and consumer rights legislation. She focuses on the operational side of compliance — helping clients design policies and processes, draft documentation, and build the internal frameworks needed to meet regulatory requirements in practice.

She also advises on contentious matters, drawing on experience managing investigations before national regulators and proceedings before national courts and the Court of Justice of the European Union. She works closely with Covington’s disputes teams on matters at the intersection of regulatory compliance and litigation.

Photo of David Brazil David Brazil

David Brazil is an associate in the Data Privacy and Cybersecurity Practice Group. He advises clients on emerging European regulations related to technology, consumer protection and cybersecurity law (such as the Digital Services Act, AI Act, DORA, Cyber Resilience Act and NIS-2). David…

David Brazil is an associate in the Data Privacy and Cybersecurity Practice Group. He advises clients on emerging European regulations related to technology, consumer protection and cybersecurity law (such as the Digital Services Act, AI Act, DORA, Cyber Resilience Act and NIS-2). David has experience advising clients on their general compliance with these rules, as well as in the context of regulatory investigations for alleged non-compliance. He has experience advising companies in various sectors, including online retail, financial services and software and cloud service providers.

Laura Schukraft

Laura Schukraft is a Legal Intern who attended the Faculty of Law of the University of Fribourg and the European Legal Studies Department of the College of Europe.